Thursday, August 24, 2006

minority protection

From http://in.rediff.com/news/2006/aug/24hair.htm

------
The forced haircut of a Sikh boy in Jaipur triggered a clash between the Bharatiya Janata Party-Akali Dal and the Congress over the issue of protection of minorities with the rival sides targeting each other over their 'poor' record.
------

Tell me one thing, what has protection of minorities by the governments got to do with this. Some crazy boys cut the hair of a Sikh boy over an issue as trivial as a love affair, and so the government is blamed for not protecting minorities. Whats the link, I just dont understand, given that I probably have a primitive brain not capable enough of understanding such things. If the government lets the culprits go, then the government can be accused of that. But how , just tell me how, can the government predict that a bunch of lovelorn fools will beat up a girls boyfriend to win her favour. And such things make it to the parliament !!! Wonder who are the bigger fools.

And as usual, those boys must be "Hindu terrorists". Now have I ever seen the media reporting such attacks and atrocities on Hindus? Of temples being destroyed, idols pissed upon or stoned.
Ohh they are afraid even to call the terrorist a terrorist, if they belong to "the minority community" to prove their secularism. Of course, it does not generate much eyeballs, and so they are not bothered.

2 Comments:

Blogger SikhsRus said...

I just understand your thinking. Ever want to feel what it feels like a minority, come to U.S.A., England, Canada or other places where Hindus are a minority and don't have much voice. Or better yet become a Sikh or a Muslim or a Buddhist, Christian in India and you will understand what it means and how it feels to be minority. If government allows people to kill each other, then it is a banana republic which I think India is becoming day by day. The way it is going, instead of being a developed country by 2020, India will be the biggest loser of the century. It is already digging its own grave by diverting Punjab water to a desert, claiming Sikhs, Buddhists and Jains to be Hindus ruining their identities, killing the hands that feed it and fight for it. I think there is hardly a true original Brahmin left in India and Indians are just copying the west and want to act like the west and forcing Sikhs, Buddhists to be one as well. It is like Jews claiming Christians, and Muslims to be Jews. If Hindus and Hindustan is so peaceful, then why Buddhism left India its birthplace. Hindustan has and is trying to do the same thing to Sikhs since 1947. At least British were smart enough to realize the potential of Sikhs as farmers and soldiers, but India is stupid enough to kill even that. For 58 years of Independence teh Hindu India could not even elect a Sikh prime Minister and it took a foreigner like Sonia Gandhi to realize their potential. Otherwise, India would have been still begging from the World bank.

Anyways, I say to India, go ahead kill all the Sikhs you want, because when you starve to death and have no Sikh to protect Hindu women from foreign invaders, only then you will realize your mistake. If it wasn't for Sikhs, the whole of India would have been and probably will be in near future reading Koran or Bible. Because history tells me Hindus can't fight and it won't be long when Hindustan would be ruled by some other invader. No matter how many nuclear bombs it has, or how strong its navy, or army or air force becomes. A country can carry the strongest weapon but its citizens do not know how to fight, how to respect teh rights of other human beings and religions, having those weapons is a useless thing.

August 28, 2006 10:23 AM  
Blogger In The Shadows said...

>>If Hindus and Hindustan is so peaceful, then why Buddhism left India its birthplace.
=====

Muslims destroyed it. Nalanda was destroyed by Muslims.

>>It is already digging its own grave by diverting Punjab water to a desert
=======
Water belongs to India, not any state like PUnjab, karnataka, etc

>>Hindustan has and is trying to do the same thing to Sikhs since 1947.
======
Who is responsible for 1984 riots. When were Hindus anti-Sikh. Sir, we know your contributions to the country, its those pseudo-secular fools who dont realize that.
Ohh by the way, its this minority thing of the pseudo-seculars that is against you. The whole minority parade is by muslims, for muslims and of muslims. Do you think they will share the spoils, after we have fallen?

>> For 58 years of Independence teh Hindu India could not even elect a Sikh prime Minister and it took a foreigner like Sonia Gandhi to realize their potential
======
I suppose, Canada, UK and USA have elected a Sikh PM, havent they?
BTW, I dont have a very good opinion of Manmohan singh, lets leave it at that.

>>go ahead kill all the Sikhs you want
====
Again, do you realize who is responsible for killing Sikhs. Not true Hindus, its the pseudo-seculars you are supporting cos they made Manmohan a puppet PM.

>>If it wasn't for Sikhs, the whole of India would have been and probably will be in near future reading Koran or Bible.
======
Very true, you are right.
Have you ever heard about Jats. And Sindh, who defeated the Arabs repeatedly and stopped overwhelming Islamization of India, before being defeated after the 17th invasion.

>>Because history tells me Hindus can't fight
====
Which history?

Anyway, my post was about altogether something else, if you read carefully. Think sir Think. Think how can the govt guess what those stupid loveydovey teenagers are going to do next. If tomorrow, some muslim kills you, will it still be held responsible for not protecting minorities??

F**king double standards !!!

August 30, 2006 2:17 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home